Free Gigarocket post for host VPSs
#31
ESET recently has been marking a few websites as malicious and I'm not sure if it's linked to the usage of Cloudflare. One of my domains were listed as malicious quite a while ago but it later disappeared after I contacted them through their samples e-mail. It's really annoying when these AV companies report false positives as it could have a negative impact on SEO on certain search engines. Are you still using Cloudflare's DNS services or have you moved to another provider for that?
#32
Our tech admin doesn't think much of Sucuri.net. He seems to think that Sucuri scans shadows that don't exist with the purpose of promoting Sucuri's service. He thinks Eset had it completely wrong and Google got it wrong too. It should be sorted out soon.

It doesn't happen often, but I differ with the Admin on Sucuri point of view.. Sucuri is particularly good with scanning Wordpress malicious code. That malicious code has become so damn sophisticated. It is sometimes difficult to see the wood from the trees. Obviously Sucuri cannot be 100% perfect, as there will always be another definition they need to add as hackers are introducing more code. But I'd think they've been around long enough to be taken seriously enough to check out the clues they provide.
#33
Looks as though the Gigarank problem has been resolved at Google (which is where it originated - false positive):
https://www.google.com/transparencyrepor...garank.net
#34
Hmmm.. i think that gigarank have good vps, only low HDD
[Image: ?id=%2Ffvps&userid=15510]
#35
(2016-07-01, 1:08:35 am)BobiMkd Wrote: Hmmm.. i think that gigarank have good vps, only low HDD

Gigarank has a great Tech Admin.  Like he has a nose for the right things to do with the Server.  I've had my VPS now for almost two years with not a single issue.  Neither have we received any other problems other than user error.  But you're right.  The specs are quite low in comparison with how fast shared hosting is.  My WP sites on Gigarank shared hosting are much faster than the ones on my VPS.  I seem to be pushing the limits of my VPS quite easily.
#36
woow ! I thought they were low spec ones . was not expecting such a strong support from you deanhills. May be I will test them and compare now that I have time to be back again !!
Many thanks to Freevps, Chris (cw1998), The Guy( ID 4810), optimus, GHP and the other  staff members.
#37
Another P2H provider...
Nice to see some competiton going around,
The VPS here at freeVPS.us are way superior though.
Thank you to http://zxplay.co.uk and https://freevps.us for the VPS 1!


[Image: img.php?userid=15852]
#38
(2016-07-01, 5:01:30 pm)JackRyder Wrote: Another P2H provider...
Nice to see some competiton going around,
The VPS here at freeVPS.us are way superior though.

Absolutely agreed.  Freevps.us is also much better organized with the giving of the VPSs.  For me it's the best provider I've seen yet and the Forum that I've learned from the most and not only about VPSs.  They've got some really great experts around here being most generous to share their expertise and experiences with those who are learning.
#39
75GB monthly transfer is too low, you can do some basic tasks with that bandwidth.
#40
(2016-11-22, 9:16:17 am)Erasmus Wrote: 75GB monthly transfer is too low, you can do some basic tasks with that bandwidth.

I think it's more than enough if you are just running a web hosting server. Only exception would be streaming videos and I don't think it's allowed there.

It might be not enough for a busy game server though. This is another question I want to ask  @deanhills, Game servers are allowed ?

[Image: img.php?v1=1&userid=8114&txt=1]







Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Switch to mobile version

Sponsors: Ftpit - ZXPlay - GalaxyHostPlus - Verelox- HostUS - Host4Fun - Evolution-Host - NodeBlade - HostDare - VPSMost


BitCoin donations: 1DQxbstaTb5SWk6QC2gFeQUTFR64JX4cEo